Re: Legal dangers (was Re: polarization)
- From: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- To: bruce perens com (Bruce Perens)
- Cc: atai atai org, foundation-list gnome org, sam uchicago edu
- Subject: Re: Legal dangers (was Re: polarization)
- Date: 03 Nov 2000 16:04:14 -0500
bruce perens com (Bruce Perens) writes:
> Yes, this is what I'm suggesting the foundation do. I don't think it would
> taint or distract the project to put a little thinking into catastrophe
> insurance. It's just due dilligence for a project that has become this large.
>
So we violently agree.
Havoc
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
