Re: Legal dangers (was Re: polarization)

bruce perens com (Bruce Perens) writes: 
> Yes, this is what I'm suggesting the foundation do. I don't think it would
> taint or distract the project to put a little thinking into catastrophe
> insurance. It's just due dilligence for a project that has become this large.

So we violently agree.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]