Re: Foundation summary

[Bart Decrem <bart eazel com>]

I'm not sure that this is the right forum for this discussion, but I'm
sure it's a politically sensitive one, so I would recommend a somewhat
more structured process where we examine what our needs our for the web
site, see what the deficiencies are with the current setup, let the world
know what are needs are, and see who's offering to solve them, and what
the trade-offs are (branding, corporate allegiances etc.).

If nothing else, we should acknowledge the role Red Hat has played in this
so far.

Bart


Kenneth Christiansen wrote:

> I cannot do anything else than agree with this.
> Go ahead and take the offer!
>
> Cheers, Kenneth
>
> ---
>
> On 29 Jul 2000, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
>
> >
> > > We need to buy a new *.gnome.org server, for example.
> >
> > VA Linux has voluntered a large server for this, as well as a network
> > connection with multiple OC-3s (whatever that is, it sounded
> > impressive) and a team of full time system administrators to look
> > after gnome.org
> >
> > I think we should accepts VA's offer, and get the servers running on
> > the same location as the source forge cluster.
> >
> > Miguel.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > foundation-list mailing list
> > foundation-list@gnome.org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-list mailing list
> foundation-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list