Minutes of the GNOME Board meeting 12 June 2001
- From: Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>
- To: foundation-announce gnome org
- Cc: foundation-list gnome org
- Subject: Minutes of the GNOME Board meeting 12 June 2001
- Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 16:47:06 -0400
Minutes of the GNOME Board meeting 12 June 2001
===============================================
Presents:
=========
Havoc Pennington (chairing)
Daniel Veillard (minutes)
Miguel de Icaza
Bart Decrem
Dan Mueth
Raph Levien
Owen Taylor
Jim Gettys
Maciej Stachowiak
Federico
Regrets:
========
John Heard
Decisions:
==========
- Not really. We grew concerns about the way to get a stable Gnome-2.0
in a reasonable time frame.
New Action:
===========
ACTION: Dan to work with Membership Committee to re-open the membership list.
ACTION: Havoc to check with Martin and Sander on the Gnome-2.0 roadmap
Actions:
========
ACTION: Havoc send the AB list to the board looking for completion
of the member liasons.
=> still pending
ACTION: John try to get a Copyright assigment form and procedure for the
GNOME Foundation
=> still pending
ACTION: Havoc take the action to send a mail on Gnotice about fostering
the GNOME-2.0 work
=> someone else did it
ACTION: John to ask Sander and Martin to send the Board a status
report for GNOME 2.0.
=> ???
ACTION: Federico to draft policies for @gnome.org email aliases,
CVS access, and FTP access.
=> about to send it
ACTION: Maciej to email the Board the current draft of the platform
license policy for review.
=> still pending
Basically the Board sucked w.r.t. doing it's ACTIONs items, boooo!
Discussion:
===========
- Outstanding actions: 1.4.1 coordinators, CVS/ftp/email/etc.
policy, license policy, etc.
Federico worked on this but didn't yet made it available to the
rest of the board yet.
- Discussed potential press release announcements for LinuxWorld
It might be a bit too early for a 2.0 but would be okay for a Beta 1
- Gnome 2.0
There is concerns that people are adding to HEAD, not stabilizing
it, working that way there is few chances we can ship in time.
Seems that porting the stable branch to GTK-2.0 sounds a more
reliable way to end up with something stable. Some libgnome
APIs needs to be removed by their new GTK counterparts, but
we should avoid unstable changes at the Gnome level.
- Hardware for gnome.org, no response from people we've asked,
pursue other avenues
We got no real response to our requests for hardware. It's not
a crisis but it is annoying, mail Dave Mason <dcm redhat com>
is there is a good contact point to ask.
- Revival of the X conference
the new X Technical Conference will be done in coordination with ALS
this year, Owen, Frederico, and Jim are on the program committee.
Gnome hackers working the GUI level should consider submitting papers.
Proposals must be received by July 3, 2001.
http://www.usenix.org/events/xfree86/
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network http://redhat.com/products/network/
veillard redhat com | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
Sep 17-18 2001 Brussels Red Hat TechWorld http://www.redhat-techworld.com
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]