Re: [evolution-patches] [Evolution-hackers] Fix for "agressive" memory segmentation



On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 23:22 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 15:18 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > For some strange reason I thought the pstring stuff already did that,
> > oops. I guess I was thinking of similar code I wrote a few years back
> > for another project...
> > 
> > This patch does it the way I had done it in another project of mine
> > 
> 
> Something went wrong ...

Fix

-- 
Philip Van Hoof, software developer at x-tend 
home: me at pvanhoof dot be 
gnome: pvanhoof at gnome dot org 
work: vanhoof at x-tend dot be 
http://www.pvanhoof.be - http://www.x-tend.be
? camel-mime-tables.c
Index: camel-string-utils.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gnome/evolution-data-server/camel/camel-string-utils.c,v
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -r1.6 camel-string-utils.c
--- camel-string-utils.c	6 Jul 2006 19:43:47 -0000	1.6
+++ camel-string-utils.c	6 Jul 2006 21:24:03 -0000
@@ -164,10 +164,10 @@
 	char *pstr;
 	int count;
 	
-	if (s == NULL)
+	if (str == NULL)
 		return NULL;
 	
-	if (s[0] == '\0') {
+	if (str[0] == '\0') {
 		if (own)
 			g_free (str);
 		return "";


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]