Re: [Fwd: [evolution-patches] Patch for bug 311063 (mail)]
- From: Shreyas Sriniavasan <sshreyas novell com>
- To: Carsten Guenther <Carsten Guenther scalix com>
- Cc: evolution-patches gnome org, Not Zed <notzed novell com>
- Subject: Re: [Fwd: [evolution-patches] Patch for bug 311063 (mail)]
- Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 12:13:51 +0530
On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 13:48 -0700, Carsten Guenther wrote:
> Ok, I closed 311063 as invalid and opened a new one:
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=317466
>
> Attached patch fixes the problem by not showing the location-pick dialog
> for search folders therefore not allowing nested search folders and
> removing the confusion between search and regular folders.
I am with Guenther on this one. Although the biggest bug of them all
would be "why create a location pick when i click on a folder and
say new folder ?, isnt it understood that i need a sub folder under
folder ?". I dont see the premise of having nested search folders at all
especially when i can attach multiple rules and make it one folder.
Like for example, consider search folder one contains all of partha's
mails and its nested subfolder contains all of partha's mail to shreyas
and the other nested folder contains all of partha's mail to michael.
Is this easier if u have nested search folders or if u have two search
folders
(with suitable and conditions, eg from partha and to shreyas) and so,
I would tilt towards the latter, the former is just confusing.
Cheers,
Shreyas
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]