Re: [evolution-patches] Re: Google coredumper support



On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 16:10 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote:

> I've been thinking, maybe its more appropriate to trap a signal that
> would normally generate a core anyhow, like SIGQUIT.

If it doesn't interfere with debuggers and if no developer ever wants to
do something with that signal 'the normal way', I'd say thats a good
idea.

Else, I'm not sure.


-- 
Philip Van Hoof, Software Developer @ Cronos
home: me at freax dot org
gnome: pvanhoof at gnome dot org
work: philip dot vanhoof at cronos dot be
junk: philip dot vanhoof at gmail dot com
http://www.freax.be, http://www.freax.eu.org




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]