Re: [evolution-patches] patch for #41740 (calendar)

[JP Rosevear <jpr novell com>]

On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 13:15 +0100, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> I would have used e_error, but this would mean adding new strings, so
> sticking with what we use in other parts of the calendar.
> 
> For HEAD, I can change it to use e_error, ok?

It seems better to me to just do it right for head for and skip it on
the the branch, its not a regression.

-JP
-- 
JP Rosevear <jpr novell com>
Novell, Inc.