Re: [evolution-patches] Declaration fixes in camel providers for GCC 4

[Not Zed <notzed ximian com>]

ok, patch looks fine.  now we have an explanation of why is needed.

simple: c99 is different to c89 and gcc 4 is enforcing c99  behaviour

e.g C89 3.7.1 vs C99 6.7.1p5


On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 17:14 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> The attached fixes some trivial errors under GCC 4:
> camel-imap-store-summary.c: In function
> 'camel_imap_store_summary_namespace_set':
> camel-imap-store-summary.c:392: error: invalid storage class for
> function 'namespace_clear'
> (and a similar one in the groupwise provider).  Is the code there valid
> C?  The fix is trivial.
>
> Dave