Re: [evolution-patches] patch for #36142: Don't use acronyms as verbs in messages (camel-gpg-context.c)
- From: Not Zed <notzed ximian com>
- To: Jorge Bernal <koke amedias org>
- Cc: evolution-patches <evolution-patches lists ximian com>, evolution-hackers lists ximian com
- Subject: Re: [evolution-patches] patch for #36142: Don't use acronyms as verbs in messages (camel-gpg-context.c)
- Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 11:07:40 +0800
Hmm, sure i suppose, i think there are too many strings to translate, but whatever I guess.
You don't need to cc -hackers, but the i18n team need to know of string changes once the patch is in.
Can you commit the patch, or do we need to?
Thanks,
Michael
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 02:10 +0100, Jorge Bernal wrote:
El Martes 25 Enero 2005 01:28, Not Zed escribió:
> I would suggest using some better grammar since it isn't limited by the
> string formatting anymore.
>
What about this another?
I put copy on evo-hackers since I've read strings discussions are made there.
> Then again this is a system/execution error, i'm not sure it even needs
> this detail. e.g. it only happens if gpg crashes and burns/the system
> runs out of resources, etc. So it probably rarely happens.
>
> "Error executing gpg: %s" might suffice.
>
> On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 19:07 +0100, Jorge Bernal wrote:
> > switch (gpg->mode) {
> > case GPG_CTX_MODE_SIGN:
> > - mode = "sign";
> > + mode = _("Failed to GPG sign");
> > break;
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]