Re: [evolution-patches] fix for 47824's fix

[Not Zed <notzed ximian com>]

to explicitly indicate that i dont want the return value
On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 10:08 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> any reason for the void cast?
>
> anyway, looks good.
>
> On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 02:35, Not Zed wrote:
> > previous patch had a bug in the new code.  this should fix it up. 
> > nasty crash with signed attached messages otherwise.
> > 
> > (patch is against head, but it is for 2.0)
> >