[evolution-patches] Re: Updated Patch for 72285

[Not Zed <notzed ximian com>]

this looks better to me.  although i suspect final approval should go to one of the other gw maintainers.

one point - if recp->type isn't one of the types listed, it will leak the address.  maybe a final else should unref it (i dont know if that case can ever happen though).


On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 12:17 +0530, Sankar P wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Attached with this mail is the patch for 72285.
>
> Instead of adding headers for every address, a list is generated and a
> single header is added at last, cumulatively.
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Sankar P