Re: [evolution-patches] Patch to fix implicit function declarations in e-d-s (docs, configuration, libedataserverui, weather backend, libical)
- From: Not Zed <notzed ximian com>
- To: David Malcolm <dmalcolm redhat com>
- Cc: evolution-patches lists ximian com
- Subject: Re: [evolution-patches] Patch to fix implicit function declarations in e-d-s (docs, configuration, libedataserverui, weather backend, libical)
- Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 11:44:42 +0800
It doesn't look like it conflicts with any of the warning patches i just
committed, but you might need to confirm that.
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 23:10 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> I've built evolution-data-server-1.3.8 with
> -Werror-implicit-function-declaration (i.e. GCC treats a missing
> function declaration as an error), to help track down annoying 64-bit
> int vs pointer issues.
>
> I had to apply the following patch to the tarball get everything to
> compile cleanly. Assuming this applies cleanly, does this look OK to
> commit? (with ChangeLog entries, of course)
> _______________________________________________
> evolution-patches mailing list
> evolution-patches lists ximian com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-patches
--
adfa(evolution-2.4:20087): gtkhtml-WARNING **: cannot find icon:
'stock_insert-url' in gnome
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]