Re: [evolution-patches] fix for the bug #274406 [calendar]



On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 21:55 +0530, chenthill wrote:
> Hi,
>   Have attached the fix for the bug.
> 
hmm, I don't think this is right, we have already a reference to the
client, which is what we were adding to the hash table (the client we
add is created 3 lines above), so why is this needed?

It seems to me the bug is about the async_signal_idle_cb is being called
on an already-destroyed client, rather than missing a reference. In
fact, IIRC, we already fixed some similar bug, can you still reproduce
this one?
-- 
Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo novell com>




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]