Re: [evolution-patches] 65058 again, 3rd time lucky



looks good

On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 16:13 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
> 
> Ok this is a simpler patch which fixes the test cases in 65058 and
> seems to fix the other test cases too, at least as well as the last
> patch did.
> 
> I could have added a new argument to add_puri() to tell it the parent
> needed a uri, but I didn't, since it was too much code to change (all
> the callers).
> 
> This is probably more suitable for 2.0.1 than the last patch (apart
> from the fact it actually works :), although for 2.1 i might use some
> combination of these two patches since that might fix some other
> issues - maybe.  The camel part of the last patch should go in though.
> 
> -- 
> 
> Michael Zucchi <notzed ximian com>
> "born to die, live to work, it's
> all downhill from here"
> Novell's Evolution and Free
> Software Developer
-- 
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc.
fejj ximian com  - www.novell.com

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]