Re: [evolution-patches] header decoding patch

[Not Zed <notzed ximian com>]

uh, so why does the code ust rfc 2047 decoding?

>From what i can read ... "two or more 2047 encoded words" is more
accurate than using "words", which have ZER0 I18N capability.

On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 09:18 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> Sure, although this is just a workaround for broken mailers. It is
> illegal to encode parameters like this using the rules in rfc2047.
> Mailers are supposed to be using rfc2231 (or its predecessor, rfc2184).
> 
> Jeff
> 
> On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 04:58, Andrei Nigmatulin wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > This patch fixes incorrect decoding of attachment filename.
> > If filename specified in Content-Disposition header is made
> > of two or more "encoded words" (in terms of rfc2047)
> > then mailer try to decode such filename as it was one "encoded word".
> -- 
> Jeffrey Stedfast
> Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc.
> fejj ximian com  - www.ximian.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Evolution-patches mailing list
> Evolution-patches lists ximian com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-patches