Re: [evolution-patches] newest patch for fix non rfc2047 compliant i18n mailer

[cantona <cantona softhome net>]

On Wed, 2004-06-02 at 23:36 +0800, cantona wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-06-02 at 19:49 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > are you sure this is right?  why are the q and b cases different?
> > shouldn't they be the same?  they should really be the same code
> > instance too, they both do basically the same thing.
> > 
> in q case can be =?UTF-7?Q?=E9=98=BF=E9=98=BF=E9=98=BF?=
> 
> so it is suppose to be "inptr = strstr(start+1, "=?")" instead of scan
> the "?="
> 
> in b case it is only can be =?blah?b?blah=?
> so "inptr = strstr(start+1, "?=") + 2"  is the way
> 
typo: 
in b case it is only can be =?blah?b?blah?= 
or can be =?blah?b?blah=?=