looks good. On Tue, 2004-07-27 at 08:20 +0000, Not Zed wrote: > > ok addresses the bug, fwiw (which i think is 'very little'). it could > be expensive to calculate, so i'm not sure if its really worth it > (e.g. you could end up scanning the full tree once, times the number > of times it thinks it needs to update it, which is at least 2-3 times > each time the cursor moves). > > but also cleans up the api marginally, and fixes 'select next thread' > so it works if sorting is turned on, rather than running off the raw > unsorted model data. Which i'm susprised has never been reported - i > guess nobody much uses it anyway. it seems rather pointless to me. > > -- > > Michael Zucchi <notzed ximian com> > "born to die, live to work, it's > all downhill from here" > Novell's Evolution and Free > Software Developer -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc. fejj ximian com - www.novell.com
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature