sure, seems ok. Jeff On Thu, 2004-07-22 at 16:31 +0800, Not Zed wrote: > > oh this is fun, i have no idea what the old code was trying to do, its > origins are clearly lost in the mists of time. > > but basically we were getting a message-selected event before the > message was selected (or the selection changed) so when we went to > update the ui we got the old selection instead. > > this fixes it, and also reduces a bunch of redundant events as a > sideffect. i actually have no idea how the old code actually managed > to change the selection, since it didn't do it explictly. bizarre. > > -- > > Michael Zucchi <notzed ximian com> > "born to die, live to work, it's > all downhill from here" > Novell's Evolution and Free > Software Developer -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc. fejj ximian com - www.novell.com
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature