Re: [evolution-patches] Mailer bug #127521: Inline PGP support for evolution (part A: only sending), reviewed
- From: Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj ximian com>
- To: Not Zed <notzed ximian com>
- Cc: Bohumir Jelinek <bj48 ra msstate edu>, Evolution Patches <evolution-patches ximian com>
- Subject: Re: [evolution-patches] Mailer bug #127521: Inline PGP support for evolution (part A: only sending), reviewed
- Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 17:55:43 -0500
On Sun, 2004-01-11 at 23:35, Not Zed wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 00:50 -0600, Bohumir Jelinek wrote:
> > This allows Evolution to send clearsigned messages.
> >
> > @@ -183,6 +183,7 @@
> >
> > /* utility functions */
> > int camel_cipher_canonical_to_stream(CamelMimePart *part, guint32 flags, CamelStream *ostream);
> > +int camel_cipher_data_wrapper_to_canon_stream (CamelDataWrapper *dw, guint32 flags, CamelStream *ostream);
>
> There should probably be some consistency here, since they both do
> essentially the same thing.
>
> Actually the second is hardly needed, since it doesn't actually contain
> much code, the other is needed since it needs to change the parts also.
>
>
>
> I guess teh patch looks essentially ok. I didn't think of this earlier,
> but it probably makes sense just to have a 'mode' on the gpg cipher
> context for clearsign vs mime sign, the same way the smime context has a
> mode to mime sign vs envelope sign. The same mode setting would affect
> encryption mode as well.
yea, this is probably the nicest way of doing it...
>
> Then all the details can be handled in the context, and the creation
> code in the composer is simpler.
this would be nice.
Jeff
>
> Z
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Evolution-patches mailing list
> Evolution-patches lists ximian com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-patches
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc.
fejj ximian com - www.ximian.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]