[evolution-patches] Re: [Evolution-hackers] Post-to header implementation

[Meilof <meilof wanadoo nl>]

Not Zed wrote:

> Anyway, I would say the patch can go in as is (almost!), to make the
> ui freeze deadline, then the changes below can be applied afterwards.
> Most are cosmetic, but a couple are important (g_ascii_strcasecmp, and
> the folder persistent meta-data storage).
>
> You must fix the C89 inline-variable declaration(s? i only saw one)
> though.
>
> And write some ChangeLog's too (or include them in the diff's if you
> haven't been).  Given that you're in Europe, I think if JP agrees, and
> its needed for the deadline, Jeff can apply/commit the patch as is (with
> the c99 fix, assuming he too has no material objections), but we'll
> still need changelogs asap.
I have done the c99 fix and added the changelogs:

http://home.wanadoo.nl/meilof/evolution-nntp-patch-16

Will do at least the one-liners mentioned by notzed this afternoon, just 
see if I can get it in time for the freeze (which is how late exactly btw?)


Meilof
-- meilof wanadoo nl