Re: [evolution-patches] patch for camel groupwise provider and config listener
- From: JP Rosevear <jpr ximian com>
- To: Not Zed <notzed ximian com>
- Cc: Siva <snallagatla novell com>, evolution-patches ximian com
- Subject: Re: [evolution-patches] patch for camel groupwise provider and config listener
- Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 21:39:07 -0500
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 17:52, Not Zed wrote:
> >
> > From: Siva <snallagatla novell com>
> > To: evolution-patches ximian com
> > Subject: [evolution-patches] patch for camel groupwise provider and
> config listener
> > Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 19:07:07 +0530 (Fri, 00:07 CST)
> >
> > Hi,
> > I am attaching a patch which has a camel provider for groupwise.
> > groupwise camel provider juset uses IMAP for it provider store and
> SMTP
> > for its transport.
>
> So as discussed earlier, this is totally the wrong place to put this
> code.
And as also discussed earlier this is what we are doing for this
release.
> A camel provider is the lowest-level camel remote object, it shouldn't
> be managing other stuff. If you want meta-accounts, it should be
> managed elsewhere, although I don't know where it would fit, it
> doesn't even fit in the mailer as such. e.g. its no different from
> having a ldap configuration controlling mail + calendar for you.
I agree we should have a place for the meta account stuff, but we don't
and this is currently the best solution given the time frame.
-JP
--
JP Rosevear <jpr ximian com>
Ximian, Inc.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]