Re: [evolution-patches] patch for evolution-1.4

[Not Zed <notzed ximian com>]

What's the bug number for this?

The fix is reasonable since we have a 64K sanity check on the strings,
_and_ the strings are merely for display info, not a canonical source
(actually 128K or even 1K would probably suffice if it was just used for
that ...).

On Thu, 2004-02-12 at 16:48 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:

> patch fixes the bug described in forwarded message; the To: header in
> the mail was 78K and camel_file_utils_decode_string() would fail if
> the encoded 32bit length was >65536
> 
> not sure this is the appropriate fix or not tho.
> 
> Jeff
> 
> -- 
> Jeffrey Stedfast
> Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc.
> fejj ximian com  - www.ximian.com