The gal changes also require increasing the CURRENT of the library, since the changes are binary incompatible, and it means removing some API. -- dobey On Enj , 2004-02-05 at 11:41, Radek Doulík wrote: > On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 15:36 +0100, Radek Doulík wrote: > > On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 09:02 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote: > > > On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 08:40, Radek Doulík wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 20:00 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 19:11, Christine McLellan wrote: > > > > > > Dan -- Thank you so much! > > > > > > > > > > > > Tim/Mark -- Have you guys tested 1.4 on GNOME2.5? Will you be able to > > > > > > give it a go before 1.4.6??? Are there other big gotchas out there? > > > > > > > > > > The biggest gotchas I've seen are the occasional crashes (likely gtk+) > > > > > and the de-sensitization of the Normal/Pre-Format/etc menu in the > > > > > composer. > > > > > > > > the de-sensitization fix we have in 1.5.x can be used for 1.4.x as well. > > > > > > And it will work for gtk+ 2.2 and 2.0? If so, lets get it in. > > > > Yes, it should. I tried to compile gtkhtml 3.0.x with gtk 2.3.x, but > > looks like gal 2.0.x needs some patching as well. > > gal and gtkhtml patches attached. gal also needs > gal/gal/widgets/gal*.[ch] from gal/HEAD. >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part