Re: [Fwd: [evolution-patches] fix for bug #62665]
- From: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- To: JP Rosevear <jpr novell com>
- Cc: Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj ximian com>, release-team gnome org, evolution-patches ximian com
- Subject: Re: [Fwd: [evolution-patches] fix for bug #62665]
- Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 22:33:22 +0200
On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 12:52 -0400, JP Rosevear wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 12:10 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > I've tested it - it wouldn't be up for review if it hadn't been tested.
> >
> > On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 17:58 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > > During hard-code-freeze, we like to know how much patches have been tested
> > > so that you're very confident that it won't introduce new serious bugs.
> > > You are probably far more thorough than most, but still we'd like to have
> > > that box checked.
>
> What kind of testing are you looking for?
The more the better. For instance, it's nice to know when a bug
submitter has used a patch for a while. This phase of the release cycle
is scary, as I'm sure you know.
I'm sure that you test patches quite thoroughly. I just wanted to hear
it.
> We peer review the patches as
> well.
Excellent.
So here's 1 of 2 necessary approvals for that patch.
Murray
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]