Re: [evolution-patches] patch for #58824 (calendar)

[Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo novell com>]

On Thu, 2004-08-19 at 10:10 -0400, JP Rosevear wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-08-17 at 17:50 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > On Tue, 2004-08-17 at 10:49 -0400, JP Rosevear wrote:
> > > Maybe we should only call e_cal_open_async if the calendar is not loaded
> > > like elsewhere in the code?
> > > 
> > updated patch that includes your suggestion and a change to make it
> > always use the same view for status messages, which seems to be indeed
> > the real cause of the problem
> 
> I don't think the latter part of this is so, do we do set the same
> activity handler on every view?
> 
we do, but each view uses a different ID when calling
e_activity_handler_operation_started. That's why it seems some stray
message was kept around, since some status message was initiated on a
view, and cleared from a different view, which left it around. Using the
same view always makes sure we use the same ID always when calling
e_activity_handler_operation_started from gnome-cal.c
-- 
Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo novell com>