Re: [evolution-patches] Patch for the receipt bounty (#127534)
- From: Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj ximian com>
- To: Not Zed <notzed ximian com>
- Cc: ERDI Gergo <cactus cactus rulez org>, asdf <evolution-patches lists ximian com>
- Subject: Re: [evolution-patches] Patch for the receipt bounty (#127534)
- Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 10:01:30 -0400
On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 09:55, Not Zed wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 09:48 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 06:33, ERDI Gergo wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > >
> > > > I think that there should probably be a default per-account setting for
> > > > whether or not the composer should default to requesting a receipt.
> > > > other than that, I think the composer code looks ok so far.
> > >
> > > From the bounty description (emphasis mine):
> > > "Add an option to the composer for "Request a Read Receipt for this
> > > Message" (or something like that). *This would always default to being
> > > off*. Make the composer generate proper MDN request headers if the option
> > > is turned on."
> >
> > if the other settings are going to be per-account, then so should this.
> >
> > it's like 5 lines of code... seriously.
>
> Really? Its the sort of feature you only use sometimes on more
> important emails, you don't want to go broadcasting stuff like that on
> all your mails, even from specific accounts I would suggest.
I guess you're right. n/m
> > > Umm... but surely the best default behaviour is to ask the user so he can
> > > decide?
> >
> > no. dialog popups are annoying and most people will not want this
> > feature, hence it should default to off.
> >
> > the people who want it will know to look for it.
> I'm on jeff here :)
>
> But these are all really ui issues I guess.
> > > "For Internet Mail user agents, it is recommended that this field contain
> > > both the DNS name of the particular instance of the UA that generated the
> > > MDN and the name of the product. For example,
> > >
> > > Reporting-UA: rogers-mac.dcrt.nih.gov; Foomail 97.1"
> > >
> > > so gethostname() should be close enough, this is not information used to
> > > somehow connect to the machine so it shouldn't cause any problmes if it's
> > > not an FQDN.
> >
> > DNS name is an FQDN. but whatever.
> We only use gethostname for the messageid fqdn. And so it should be,
> if it isn't it's just a badly configured system.
we start with gethostname() and then pass it off to camel's
gethostbyname() equiv in order to get the FQDN (or at least *try*)
Jeff
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]