[evolution-patches] fix for bug #46006, need to prefix IPv6 numeric host addrs with "IPv6:" in SMTP EHLO command
- From: Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj ximian com>
- To: evolution-patches ximian com
- Subject: [evolution-patches] fix for bug #46006, need to prefix IPv6 numeric host addrs with "IPv6:" in SMTP EHLO command
- Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 11:12:06 -0400
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc.
fejj ximian com - www.ximian.com
Index: ChangeLog
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gnome/evolution/camel/ChangeLog,v
retrieving revision 1.1836.2.14
diff -u -r1.1836.2.14 ChangeLog
--- ChangeLog 23 Sep 2003 01:01:05 -0000 1.1836.2.14
+++ ChangeLog 25 Sep 2003 14:44:06 -0000
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+2003-09-25 Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj ximian com>
+
+ * providers/smtp/camel-smtp-transport.c (smtp_helo): If the
+ localhost lookup results in a numeric IPv6 host, use the form
+ "[IPv6:<addr>]" as specified in rfc2821. Fixes bug #46006.
+
+2003-09-23 Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj ximian com>
+
+ * camel-mime-utils.c (append_8bit): Don't forget to flush the
+ iconv conversion.
+
2003-09-22 Not Zed <NotZed Ximian com>
** See bug #41610
Index: providers/smtp/camel-smtp-transport.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gnome/evolution/camel/providers/smtp/camel-smtp-transport.c,v
retrieving revision 1.138
diff -u -r1.138 camel-smtp-transport.c
--- providers/smtp/camel-smtp-transport.c 16 May 2003 18:47:59 -0000 1.138
+++ providers/smtp/camel-smtp-transport.c 25 Sep 2003 14:44:07 -0000
@@ -896,8 +896,10 @@
} else {
#ifdef ENABLE_IPv6
char ip[MAXHOSTNAMELEN + 1];
+ const char *proto;
- name = g_strdup_printf ("[%s]", inet_ntop (af, transport->localaddr->address, ip, MAXHOSTNAMELEN));
+ proto = transport->localaddr->family == CAMEL_TCP_ADDRESS_IPv6 ? "IPv6:" : "";
+ name = g_strdup_printf ("[%s%s]", proto, inet_ntop (af, transport->localaddr->address, ip, MAXHOSTNAMELEN));
#else
/* We *could* use inet_ntoa() here, but it's probably
not worth it since we would have to worry about
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]