Re: [evolution-patches] calendar and conduit patches for darwin
- From: JP Rosevear <jpr ximian com>
- To: Dan Winship <danw ximian com>
- Cc: evolution-patches ximian com
- Subject: Re: [evolution-patches] calendar and conduit patches for darwin
- Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 21:11:42 -0400
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 16:21, Dan Winship wrote:
> Two things I could have sworn we fixed for 1.2.x...
>
> The calendar change makes it not compile evolution-calendar.idl into
> libevolution-calendar, because it's already in libcal-client (and
> darwin's linker will complain about duplicate symbols).
>
> The conduit change makes the addressbook conduit not use
> libeconduit-static, paralleling the change already made to the calendar
> and todo conduits. [The reason this is needed is that darwin gets
> annoyed when you try to create a static archive with no members, which
> will happen if you configure without pilot support.]
Conduit bits approved.
> JP: If we can get rid of libeconduit-static, we should be able to get
> rid of *all* of the -static libs, right? [libebook-static,
> libcal-client-static, libcal-util-static, libcamel-static,
> libename-static, libeutil-static, and libical-static]. Should I try that
> out on HEAD?
Sure.
-JP
--
JP Rosevear <jpr ximian com>
Ximian, Inc.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]