Re: [evolution-patches] Camel-stream-process.

[David Woodhouse <dwmw2 infradead org>]

On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 18:50 -0500, Not Zed wrote:
> Well as it is now, it isn't useful for anything else that needs
> processes.  e.g. piping to a shell command, filtering through a shell
> command, or running a subservient task like gpg.  Which is why i suggest
> you just leave it imap.

Looks like I could use it from the sendmail provider without trouble,
likewise camel-filter-{search,driver}.c. If I do one of those to refute
your statement above, can I leave it where it is? :)

I do agree it could do with being a little more flexible about which fds
go where, though. I'll look at implementing what you suggested -- it
_doesn't_ look too overdesigned, now that I'm somewhat more relaxed
because Evo is at last capable of getting to my IMAP servers
out-of-the-box :)

-- 
dwmw2