Re: [evolution-patches] xlib async reply fix



On Thu, 2003-05-29 at 22:25, Not Zed wrote:
> 43805?
> 
> Looks good.
> 
> 
> One idea might be to merge the play sound thing, and have
> session_beep call play sound with a filename of NULL.  But that should
> wait till later.
> 
> (same goes for having the session beep callback in the first place i
> guess).

yea, thought about that. I wonder if I have a better idea though...

instead of doing this whole new-mail-notify thing via filters, I wonder
if a better way might be to have a signal on the store that can be fired
whenever one of its folders gets new mail? this way things would work
better for imap (and filtering wouldn't need to be enabled).

I'm just thinking the current implementation is fundamentally broken
(shame on me I guess).

Jeff

> 
> 
> On Fri, 2003-05-30 at 11:29, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > forget the bug #, maybe toshok knows
> > 
> > Jeff
-- 
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc.
fejj ximian com  - www.ximian.com




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]