Re: [evolution-patches] rpm spec of gal broke again



I would be willing to help.

What are your suggestions? Which are the worse parts in your opinion?

Regards, Rui

On Wed, 2003-05-14 at 00:24, Rodney Dawes wrote:
> Aside from the gal.spec.in just being horribly broken anyway, the patch
> looks fine. :)
> 
> -- dobey
> 
> On Tue, 2003-05-13 at 19:03, Mike Kestner wrote:
> > Seems fine.
> > 
> > If nobody else has any feedback, I'll commit it tomorrow.  Thanks for
> > the patch.
> > 
> > Mike
> > 
> > On Tue, 2003-05-13 at 09:01, Rui Miguel Seabra wrote:
> > > Amazing the things one learns even when documentation is poor :)
> > > 
> > > Thanks Frederic.
> > > 
> > > New patch attached.
> > > 
> > > Hugs, Rui
> > > 
> > > On Tue, 2003-05-13 at 10:38, Frederic Crozat wrote:
> > > > fontLe mar 13/05/2003 à 13:31, Rui Miguel Seabra a écrit :
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > > 
> > > > > The attached patch fixes gal's spec which is broke, again.
> > > > 
> > > > This patch is wrong.. You should use %find_lang %{name}-%{version} and
> > > > add -f %{name}-%{version}.lang to %files so locales are correctly tagged
> > > > by RPM when generating the package.
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Evolution-patches mailing list
> > Evolution-patches lists ximian com
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-patches
-- 
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?

Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]