Re: [evolution-patches] Yet more 64bit cleanups

[Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj ximian com>]

The camel/mail/e-sexp patches look okay to me.

NotZed: look ok to you?

Jeff

On Mon, 2003-05-05 at 19:10, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> Attached are patches to fix a number of places that aren't 64bit
> clean.   It's not a small set of changes, but the vast majority of the
> changes fall into one of a few categories:
> *) Incorrectly just casting pointers and ints around like they're
> equivalent.  Lots of changes to use the glib macros defined explicitly
> for this purpose
> *) A few places in camel were using ints for length when other parts of
> the camel API were expecting a size_t.  So changes a few camel APIs to
> use size_t when things that they call expect a size_t as size_t is more
> likely to be what is really wanted.
> *) Some added #include's to end the complaints about implicit function
> declarations
> 
> Patch is broken up into one patch per directory which needed changes.  I
> can try to split things up a bit more if anyone wants as requested.
> 
> With this applied, cvs as of earlier today was working nicely on AMD64
> with spot testing across most things and the really ugly warnings when
> building on a 64bit platform are cleaned up.
> 
> Jeremy
-- 
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc.
fejj ximian com  - www.ximian.com