Re: [evolution-patches] another fix for 42038
- From: Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj ximian com>
- To: Not Zed <notzed ximian com>
- Cc: evolution-patches ximian com
- Subject: Re: [evolution-patches] another fix for 42038
- Date: 01 May 2003 21:31:49 -0400
looks good to me.
Jeff
On Thu, 2003-05-01 at 22:29, Not Zed wrote:
> instead of crashing, just assume any unknown response is equivalent
> cancel, rather than trying to deal with all possibilities explictly. -
> another one was missed in the last patch.
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> Index: e-util/ChangeLog
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/gnome/evolution/e-util/ChangeLog,v
> retrieving revision 1.386
> diff -u -3 -r1.386 ChangeLog
> --- e-util/ChangeLog 30 Apr 2003 19:47:16 -0000 1.386
> +++ e-util/ChangeLog 2 May 2003 01:19:41 -0000
> @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
> +2003-05-02 Not Zed <NotZed Ximian com>
> +
> + * e-request.c (e_request_string): remove the assert, if we dont
> + understand the response, assume it's a cancel.
> + GTK_RESPONSE_DELETE_EVENT wasn't handled [#42038].
> +
> 2003-04-30 Ettore Perazzoli <ettore ximian com>
>
> * e-request.c (e_request_string): Handle GTK_RESPONSE_NONE.
> Index: e-util/e-request.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/gnome/evolution/e-util/e-request.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.11
> diff -u -3 -r1.11 e-request.c
> --- e-util/e-request.c 30 Apr 2003 19:47:16 -0000 1.11
> +++ e-util/e-request.c 2 May 2003 01:19:41 -0000
> @@ -91,12 +91,9 @@
> case GTK_RESPONSE_OK:
> text = g_strdup (gtk_entry_get_text (GTK_ENTRY (entry)));
> break;
> - case GTK_RESPONSE_CANCEL:
> - case GTK_RESPONSE_NONE:
> + default:
> text = NULL;
> break;
> - default:
> - g_assert_not_reached ();
> }
>
> gtk_widget_destroy (dialog);
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc.
fejj ximian com - www.ximian.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]