Re: [evolution-patches] etree patch
- From: Mike Kestner <mkestner ximian com>
- To: Dan Winship <danw ximian com>
- Cc: evolution-patches ximian com
- Subject: Re: [evolution-patches] etree patch
- Date: 27 Jun 2003 15:26:24 -0500
On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 14:49, Dan Winship wrote:
> <soapbox>Using g_new rather than g_new0 to initialize priv structures is
> evil</soapbox>
I agree. I like init funcs that just init the non-zero stuff.
As far as the patch goes, the row_inserted and row_deleted signals are
no longer attached, so it would probably be cleaner to remove all
references to them. Otherwise, looks fine.
Thanks.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]