Re: [evolution-patches] 45063, more etree api workarounds
- From: Not Zed <notzed ximian com>
- To: Mike Kestner <mkestner ximian com>
- Cc: Ettore Perazzoli <ettore ximian com>, evolution-patches ximian com
- Subject: Re: [evolution-patches] 45063, more etree api workarounds
- Date: 19 Jun 2003 08:58:28 +0930
On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 07:52, Mike Kestner wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 17:04, Ettore Perazzoli wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 17:13, Not Zed wrote:
> > > this can't be done in the message-list since it doesn't know which
> > > message the folder-browser has displayed.
> >
> > + * folder-browser.c (do_message_selected): dont re-load if the same
> > + message gets selected again as one we've already shown. Etree
> > + sends out selection changed events even when when it hasn't.
> >
> > Could this be fixed in ETree instead?
>
> Is this over one of those intervals where the tree is torn down and
> rebuilt? Not sure how we'd suppress the signal in that scenario.
ahh yes, i forgot about that :-/
> If it's a double emission of the same selection on a stable tree (which
> wouldn't surprise me that much), I can take a look, but with the way
> that signals wind in and out through etree/etable, it's hard to say
> whether I can fix it without rearchitecting. :/
yeah i figured either way this is probably easier ...
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]