[evolution-patches] Re: [Evolution-hackers] Mailing list actions bounty (2)

[David Woodhouse <dwmw2 infradead org>]

On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 02:22 +0100, Jorge Bernal wrote:
> I have an improved patch for the Mailing list actions bounty. It uses an anchor
> instad of an object tag and some other improvements
>
> Please  give me your comments/advices/...

It'd be really nice if it could also handle the mail sent to list admins
by mailman -- see the attached. If there was _any_ way for Evolution to
reply to the message/rfc822 attachment, that'd be a start; but ideally
I'd get 'Discard' and 'Accept' buttons for the mail in question.


--  
dwmw2

--- Begin Message ---

• From: linux-mtd-owner lists infradead org
• To: linux-mtd-owner lists infradead org
• Subject: linux-mtd post from michael howard med ge com requires approval
• Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2003 01:01:33 +0000

As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the
following mailing list posting:

    List:    linux-mtd lists infradead org
    From:    michael howard med ge com
    Subject: RE: Why restrict to page aligned writes in nand_write_ecc() ?
    Reason:  Message has a suspicious header

At your convenience, visit:

    http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/admindb/linux-mtd
        
to approve or deny the request.

--- Begin Message ---

• From: "Howard, Michael (MED)" <Michael Howard med ge com>
• To: "'David Woodhouse'" <dwmw2 infradead org>, Jasmine Strong <jasmine regolith co uk>
• Cc: "'linux-mtd lists infradead org'" <linux-mtd lists infradead org>
• Subject: RE: Why restrict to page aligned writes in nand_write_ecc() ?
• Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 18:58:37 -0600

How can you turn this batching of writes on?

Thanks

-----Original Message-----
From: David Woodhouse [mailto:dwmw2 infradead org]
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 6:05 PM
To: Jasmine Strong
Cc: Howard, Michael (MED); 'linux-mtd lists infradead org'
Subject: Re: Why restrict to page aligned writes in nand_write_ecc() ?


On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 23:45 -0100, Jasmine Strong wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, David Woodhouse wrote:
> 
> > > For jffs2 to work properly it's pretty much essential to support
partial
> > > page writing.  You also need to support subsequent writes to the same
> > > partially-written page.
> >
> > No. The current JFFS2 code handles batching writes up into page-sized
> > chunks just fine.
> 
> ...what about power failures?

sys_fsync() and sys_sync() trigger garbage collection to flush pending
data from the write buffer. If there's nothing to GC, we pad it with
zeroes. There's also a timed flush which behaves similarly.

-- 
dwmw2

--- End Message ---

--- Begin Message ---

• From: linux-mtd-request lists infradead org
• Subject: confirm d8b566340ae6974811485b2c2b8c813b07ec9f44
• Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 18:06:12 +0000

If you reply to this message, keeping the Subject: header intact,
Mailman will discard the held message.  Do this if the message is
spam.  If you reply to this message and include an Approved: header
with the list password in it, the message will be approved for posting
to the list.  The Approved: header can also appear in the first line
of the body of the reply.

--- End Message ---

--- End Message ---