Re: [evolution-patches] 47765, fix for (match-all (match-all)) bug
- From: Not Zed <notzed ximian com>
- To: evolution-patches ximian com
- Subject: Re: [evolution-patches] 47765, fix for (match-all (match-all)) bug
- Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 14:10:22 -0500
I'll commit this as is.
On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 17:10, Not Zed wrote:
> Duh, should've tested it. It didn't work.
> This should, and passes the test suite, although i'm not sure how much
> it tests match-all.
> On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 17:19, Not Zed wrote:
> > Didnt get around to testing this because of my head build tree. i guess
> > i should, but in the meantime, someone else can check it too.
> > main problem is (match-all (match-all)) the second match-all wasn't
> > recognising it was inside a match-all already, so it returned a vector
> > when it should've returned a scalar on the current message.
] [Thread Prev