Re: [evolution-patches] 47765, fix for (match-all (match-all)) bug

[Not Zed <notzed ximian com>]

I'll commit this as is.


On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 17:10, Not Zed wrote:
> Duh, should've tested it.  It didn't work.
> 
> This should, and passes the test suite, although i'm not sure how much
> it tests match-all.
> 
> On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 17:19, Not Zed wrote:
> > Didnt get around to testing this because of my head build tree.  i guess
> > i should, but in the meantime, someone else can check it too.
> > 
> > main problem is (match-all (match-all)) the second match-all wasn't
> > recognising it was inside a match-all already, so it returned a vector
> > when it should've returned a scalar on the current message.
> > 
> >