Re: [evolution-patches] seeking review for bug 46706 :Evolution - 1.4 Evo hangs when forward one contact.
- From: Gilbert Fang <gilbert fang sun com>
- To: Chris Toshok <toshok ximian com>, Not Zed <notzed ximian com>
- Cc: "evolution-patches ximian com" <evolution-patches ximian com>
- Subject: Re: [evolution-patches] seeking review for bug 46706 :Evolution - 1.4 Evo hangs when forward one contact.
- Date: 15 Aug 2003 10:54:59 +0800
Hi, Chris And Not Zed
I know you all very busy. But this patch is very simply, only one line
change, and it can fix an acutally crashing. So could you please take a
little time to have a look at it.
Thank you very much
Gilbert
On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 19:20, Gilbert Fang wrote:
> Hi, Not Zed
>
> Thanks.
>
> The new patch is using memcpy. Please review it.
>
>
> Best regards
> Gilbert
>
> On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 02:31, Not Zed wrote:
> > Since this is a char sequence, rather than a string, it should probably
> > use memcpy() rather than strcpy() since the trailing NUL is redundant?
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 02:54, Gilbert Fang wrote:
> > > Hi, Chris
> > >
> > > The bug will hang/crash the evolution. It exists on Suse(SLEC-GM) but
> > > not in RH8.
> >
> > > I find it is because the mem aollocation error. The patch works well
> > > in my Suse workspace.
> > >
> > > here is my comments on the patch
> > > - attach_data->_maximum = attach_data->_length = strlen (tempstr);
> > > + attach_data->_maximum = attach_data->_length = strlen (tempstr) + 1;
> > > attach_data->_buffer = CORBA_sequence_CORBA_char_allocbuf
> > > (attach_data->_length);
> > > strcpy (attach_data->_buffer, tempstr);
> > >
the new patch here does not increase the attach_data->_length, but using
memcpy instead of strcpy according to NotZed's suggestion.
> > > Since attach_data is not a Corba string, it is only a sequence of
> > > char, the allocbuf will not be sure to allocate the extra space for
> > > the terminated byte '\0'. Thus the strcpy would be easily beyond
> > > the memory boundry and evolution will hang or crash some lines later.
> > >
> > > But what confused me is the orginial code can work well in RH8. I
> > > guess RH8 has added some protection codes to avoid such errors.
> > > Anyway, the patch will not have any harm to other platform and really
> > > fix the bug on SLEC(Suse Linux Enterprise Client).
> > >
> > >
> > > Please review it for Evolution 1.4 branch.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Gilbert
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Evolution-patches mailing list
> > Evolution-patches lists ximian com
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-patches
Index: addressbook/gui/widgets/e-addressbook-util.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gnome/evolution/addressbook/gui/widgets/e-addressbook-util.c,v
retrieving revision 1.26
diff -u -r1.26 e-addressbook-util.c
--- addressbook/gui/widgets/e-addressbook-util.c 14 Jun 2003 04:34:19 -0000 1.26
+++ addressbook/gui/widgets/e-addressbook-util.c 13 Aug 2003 11:02:15 -0000
@@ -534,7 +534,7 @@
attach_data = GNOME_Evolution_Composer_AttachmentData__alloc();
attach_data->_maximum = attach_data->_length = strlen (tempstr);
attach_data->_buffer = CORBA_sequence_CORBA_char_allocbuf (attach_data->_length);
- strcpy (attach_data->_buffer, tempstr);
+ memcpy(attach_data->_buffer, tempstr, attach_data->_length);
g_free (tempstr);
GNOME_Evolution_Composer_attachData (composer_server,
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]