Re: [evolution-patches] Patch to fix libsoup build

[JP Rosevear <jpr ximian com>]

On Mon, 2003-04-21 at 11:42, Rodney Dawes wrote:
> The snapshot will sort higher because 0.<timestamp> is appended to the
> version number. Thus .17 becomes .17.0.20030421070043 or something
> similar. The stable snapshots behave differently, but those are stable
> snaps, and I believe that they will still sort higher due to the way
> the release string is set up. Either way, appending the .99 is
> unimportant for snapshots, other than the fact that it is slightly less
> confusing to just look at it and see the .99 there, which immediately
> implies it is from CVS, at least, that's how my eyes are trained. :)

Maybe the rev has changed then?  We used to use .snapshot because if we
ever had to package something we didn't control from cvs (that had the
version number already bumped) we wanted the real release to install
over the snapshot with the same version.

-JP
-- 
JP Rosevear <jpr ximian com>
Ximian, Inc.