Re: [Evolution-hackers] Camel in evolution-data-server, a different proposal
- From: Philip Van Hoof <spam pvanhoof be>
- To: JP Rosevear <jpr novell com>
- Cc: evolution-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] Camel in evolution-data-server, a different proposal
- Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 14:25:38 +0200
On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 10:05 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 15:35 -0400, JP Rosevear wrote:
> > I think you're only real example is camel, which shares code with the other pieces anyhow.
>
> Knowing is a good idea.
Hrmm. After re-reading my own stuff, I apologise for the tone. I'm not
afraid of admitting when I make a mistake.
I'll rewrite:
I think it's interesting to know on which code-pieces Camel depends.
This will make future decisions and discussions about it more easy.
For that reason I decided to investigate it a little it. It turns out
only the following files are being used by Camel: e-trie.c, e-iconv.c,
e-memory.c, e-msgport.c, e-sexp.c, e-time-utils.c, e-data-server-util.c,
md5-utils.c
--
Philip Van Hoof, software developer at x-tend
home: me at pvanhoof dot be
gnome: pvanhoof at gnome dot org
work: vanhoof at x-tend dot be
http://www.pvanhoof.be - http://www.x-tend.be
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]