Re: [Evolution-hackers] ... and how camel should be

[Lee Revell <rlrevell joe-job com>]

On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 19:40 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 13:02 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 18:57 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> > 
> > I really don't think the message IDs are the main source of bloat in
> > Evo.
> 
> I measured it ;-)
> 
> 10.000 E-mails used +-8MB of memory.

Do you think that's a problem?

USER       PID %CPU %MEM    VSZ   RSS TTY      STAT START   TIME COMMAND
rlrevell 11659  5.4 37.0 260516 162700 ?       Sl   Feb13  66:07 evolution --component=mail

Even if you're off by 4x, that's only 32MB of a 162MB footprint.  Surely
we waste a lot more on the GUI...

Personally I think Evo is already slow enough, and we cannot afford to
trade off any speed to save memory.

Lee