Re: [Evolution-hackers] Camel unreferencing question
- From: Philip Van Hoof <spam pvanhoof be>
- To: Jules Colding <colding omesc com>
- Cc: evolution-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] Camel unreferencing question
- Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 13:39:41 +0200
On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 12:32 +0200, Jules Colding wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 12:10 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> > Camel hackers,
> >
> > It's not clear from the gtk-doc API documentation* whether or not you
> > must unreference a store after getting it using camel_session_get_store
> >
> > *) http://pvanhoof.be/files/libcamel-api/html/CamelSession.html
>
> The comment for camel_session_get_service() says that the reference
> count for the service is incremented for each retrieval. This seems to
> conclusively prove that you should indeed unref the store after you are
> done with it.
Thanks Jules. I'll add the camel_object_unref and pray that things will
not crash and race
--
Philip Van Hoof, software developer at x-tend
home: me at pvanhoof dot be
gnome: pvanhoof at gnome dot org
work: vanhoof at x-tend dot be
http://www.pvanhoof.be - http://www.x-tend.be
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]