Re: [Evolution-hackers] Translations not used in Evolution (was Re: Evolution and Evolution-Data-Server branched)
- From: Not Zed <notzed ximian com>
- To: Roozbeh Pournader <roozbeh farsiweb info>
- Cc: evo-hackers <evolution-hackers gnome org>, release-team <release-team gnome org>, gnome-doc <gnome-doc-list gnome org>, gnome-i18n <gnome-i18n gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] Translations not used in Evolution (was Re: Evolution and Evolution-Data-Server branched)
- Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 09:18:59 +0800
On that file, EVOLUTION_2_4_0 is tagged on revision 1.2240, but the
evolution-2-4-0 branch is actually rooted on revision 1.2231.
The same problem seems to have occured with mail/ChangeLog,
mail/default/C/Inbox, and probably by extension any file that was
changed.
Looks like HEAD was tagged, and NOT the branch.
On Sat, 2005-09-17 at 23:40 +0430, Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
> Hi Harish,
>
> I am trying to understand why the updated Persian translation was not
> included in Evolution 2.4.0, and it really seems to me that contrary to
> your announcement on August 31, it was not translations from the
> gnome-2-12 branch that were used in Evolution 2.4.0, but translations
> from the HEAD branch.
>
> I came to this conclusion based on my comparison of the po/ChangeLog
> file from both branches:
>
> http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/evolution/po/ChangeLog?rev=HEAD&view=markup
> http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/evolution/po/ChangeLog?rev=1.2231.2&view=markup
>
> The po/ChangeLog that appeared in Evolution 2.4.0 starts with a line
> from Theppitak Karoonboonyanan, dated 2005-09-04. But as you can see,
> the latest change by Theppitak in the version with the gnome-2-12 branch
> happens on 2005-08-09, before the branching happened.
>
> It seems that the HEAD branch was mistakenly used for releasing
> Evolution 2.4.0, at least regarding the translations. The affected
> translations (translated and checked in to the gnome-2-12 branch before
> release but not used in Evolution 2.4.0) are Welsh, Persian, Estonian,
> and possibly Bengali, Lithuanian, and Turkish (depending on when you
> actually released the package). Romanian and French may have also been
> affected, but if not, that's only because they have checked in their
> translations to both branches.
>
> I and a few other translators from different teams would really
> appreciate if you could re-release a new version of Evolution, using the
> translations in the gnome-2-12 branch.
>
> Roozbeh
>
> On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 19:57 +0530, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > The gnome-2-12 branch for Evolution and Evolution-Data-Server has been
> > created. This would be the stable branch for Evolution 2.4 and
> > Evolution-Data-Server 1.4
> >
> > For action ahead on HEAD branch, check out
> > http://go-evolution.org/Evo2.6.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Harish
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gnome-i18n mailing list
> > gnome-i18n gnome org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
>
> _______________________________________________
> Evolution-hackers mailing list
> Evolution-hackers gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
--
adfa(evolution-2.4:20087): gtkhtml-WARNING **: cannot find icon:
'stock_insert-url' in gnome
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]