Re: [Evolution-hackers] [PATCH in Bugzilla] Abstraction in EMsgComposer

[Philip Van Hoof <spam pvanhoof be>]

On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 09:45 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 22:38 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
 
> > Of course should the programmer here have used this:
> 
> Why?  If there is a public data information, then there's no reason to
> use an accessor.


True. But in the case of EMsgComposer, it would be useful to make all
that data private. That way a developer could focus on replacing the
internals in e-msg-composer.c, not having to care about breaking
compatibility with other parts of Evolution.

Which is basically why I did this patch.


 
-- 
Philip Van Hoof, software developer at x-tend
home: me at pvanhoof dot be
gnome: pvanhoof at gnome dot org
work: vanhoof at x-tend dot be
http://www.pvanhoof.be - http://www.x-tend.be