Re: [Evolution-hackers] Re: detecting forgotten attachments (was Re: [Evolution-hackers] bounties)



On Saturday 09 April 2005 18:34, Nat Friedman wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 16:48 -0700, Ray Lee wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 19:23 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> > > The hard part is detecting when the user meant to attach something.
> >
> > As with anything in the domain of automatic double-checking of humans, a
> > 90% solution is nearly always better than a zero, as a 100% solution is
> > unobtainable.
>
> KMail looks for the i18n string "attach".

Actually it looks for a user configurable set of strings. i18n("attach") is 
among the defaults. The feature is configurable, but on by default. We've had 
a lot of positive feedback on this little bugger. Many of us were very 
sceptical that it would be well received, but it seems users like it a lot.

Till (KDEPIM core team)

Attachment: pgproL4pqirOa.pgp
Description: PGP signature



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]