Re: [Evolution-hackers] Status bar

[Not Zed <notzed ximian com>]

Sure, why not?  Why is it any different to preview_active?

On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 13:41 +0100, ERDI Gergo wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Jan 2004, Not Zed wrote:
> 
> > > +	gboolean do_statusbar;
> > 
> > 
> > call this statusbar_active and have it in the public object, as with
> > preview_active.
> 
> Are you sure about this? Very Bad Things could happen if some outside code
> messed with this directly instead of using set_statusbar()
> 
> -- 
>    .--= ULLA! =---------------------.   `We are not here to give users what
>    \     http://cactus.rulez.org     \   they want'  -- RMS, at GUADEC 2001
>     `---= cactus cactus rulez org =---'
> All C programs are derived from `Hello World'.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> evolution-hackers maillist  -  evolution-hackers lists ximian com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers