[Evolution-hackers] Re: Create/Modify/Remove in the Calendar



On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 06:35, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 01:32 -0400, JP Rosevear wrote:
> > So, using create/modify/remove object methods in the calendar (matching
> > the addressbook api) is starting to shape up nicely, however I
> > encountered one problem.  Create has the nice feature of returning the
> > uid of the object created (addressbook does this because it can't
> > dictate to the ldap server the id I believe).  This is nice since it
> > allows us to match the server ids (esp. in the groupwise case where we
> > can't set any old uid).
> > 
> > Now, the problem I've encountered is that itip/imip needs to keep the
> > exact uid for 3rd party objects arriving via email.
> > 
> hmm, right
> 
> > Aside from dropping this system entirely, I've thought about a couple of
> > things:
> > 
> > 1. Add a receiveObject call to match the sendObject call - both will be
> > itip/imip specific (I think this still causes some work in the case of
> > groupwise since this part will force us to retain a mapping of 3rd party
> > uids to groupwise uids).
> > 
> retain a mapping? Can't you create objects in the GW server with any
> UID?

Nope.  You put it in the system and it gives you an id.  This id is only
guaranteed to be unique to the server as well.

-JP
-- 
JP Rosevear <jpr ximian com>
Ximian, Inc.




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]