[Evolution-hackers] Re: spam filtering

[Radek Doulík <rodo ximian com>]

On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 10:33 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> I'm wondering if maybe fork()/exec()ing spamc isn't the right way to do
> this for evolution. I'm thinking that if we just communicate with spamd
> directly, we might get better than 3/4s per mesg speeds. I'm just not
> happy with the current performance that this spam-check code gets :\

yeah, that seems doable, I was thinking about it and spamc source code
looks pretty simple. I didn't look at licensing yet though. but we may
rewrite spamc source code if needed I guess.

cheers
Radek