Re: [Evolution-hackers] Camel plans and possibilities
- From: Ettore Perazzoli <ettore ximian com>
- To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2 infradead org>
- Cc: Not Zed <notzed ximian com>, Evolution Hackers Mailing List <evolution-hackers ximian com>
- Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] Camel plans and possibilities
- Date: 01 Jul 2003 11:07:52 -0400
On Tue, 2003-07-01 at 11:03, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Note that gcc has, for years, optimised the ...
>
> #ifdef __SOME_HEADER_FILE_H__
> #define __SOME_HEADER_FILE_H__
>
> /* blah blah blah */
>
> #endif /* __SOME_HEADER_FILE_H__ */
>
> ... case and doesn't even _open_ the file on the second and subsequent
> #includes.
Interesting, I didn't know that; sweet.
It sounds like there is no need at all to make the library harder to use
then...
-- Ettore
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
