Re: [Evolution-hackers] Spam filtering thoughts

[Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj ximian com>]

On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 07:35, Christopher Ness wrote:
> Wow, it's early and I haven't had a coffee yet, why am I replying??...
> 
> On Sun, 2003-08-10 at 23:47, Rodney Dawes wrote:
> > On Sun, 2003-08-10 at 16:22, Christopher Ness wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 17:48, Not Zed wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 16:19, Ettore Perazzoli wrote:
> 
> <snip />
> 
> > > Your above statement leads me to believe that Spamasassin is going to
> > > become a dependency for Evo, is this your intention?
> > 
> > If the spam filter integration stuff gets implemented for 2.0, the Evo
> > packages will depend upon Spamassassin in some manner. If we get a
> > plug-in framework going, beyond the bonobo cruft that we need to work
> > around already, then whatever plug-in for the spam filtering will depend
> > on Spamassassin (as well as be part of the default install). The way
> 
> What should the default be?  Do you plan to install this pluggin by
> default or will the user have to install the package to get this
> feature?
> 
> Why Spamassassin?  Is it because it will be easier to support for the
> masses?  Should it not be possible to allow any filter to be used?

Michael Zucchi and I want to make it so that it can be made to use any
filter program - whether it be SpamAssassin, Bogofilter, etc...

Jeff

-- 
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc.
fejj ximian com  - www.ximian.com